iWell Guard

Voices and Experiences

Experience reports on the iWell Guard from wearers in different perceptual positions. This overview presents the methodical classification of the reports, the data-protection framework, and the option of submitting your own.

VoicesOwn Reports

Table of Contents

iWell Guard protective pendant, black carbon fibre chip with gold-coloured accents

On this page we collect experience reports from wearers of the protective pendant, from trained mediums, energetic practitioners and sensitive private individuals. Each voice is identified by name, methodically situated, and worded without any healing promise.

At the centre of these experience reports stands the iWell Guard protective pendant as a practical tool through which the effects documented here have been experienced.

Experience Reports: Voices of Trained Mediums

This page focuses on experience reports: statements from trained mediums, energetic practitioners and sensitive wearers who wear the pendant in everyday life. Each voice is identified by name.

We publish experience reports only with explicit consent and with a clear indication that they are personal perceptions, not healing promises and not scientific proof.

The methodical classification of each individual voice is set out under Methodology; the tool of energetic diagnostics under Examination in the cosmic information field.

Introduction

Here we collect experience reports from people who use the pendant. The main audience groups from whom we receive particularly many responses are trained mediums and sensitive individuals, that is, people who, on the basis of their perceptual abilities or their energetic sensitivity, are able to situate in a particularly differentiated way what they feel.

All reports appear here with the express consent of their authors. If an author withdraws consent, their report is removed immediately.

Anonymised reports carry a role designation (“medium”, “sensitive person”, “naturopath”) so that the reader can situate the perspective. We never alter the content, we do not smooth wordings, and we shorten only with the author’s consent.

Position of the Experience Reports in the iWell Guard Methodology

On iWell Guard, experience reports are a distinct, methodically clearly marked class of sources. They stand alongside the three other classes of sources we use on the site: religious-historical academic sources (cited with author, work, year), mediumistic information from the cosmic information field (see Methodology), and the inner teaching of the iWell Guard tradition.

Experience reports are not scientific proof but subjective statements by individual wearers about their perception of the pendant.

We weight the reports according to the perceptual position of their authors: trained mediums and people with pronounced energetic sensitivity generally provide more differentiated observations because they can distinguish energetic layers that remain invisible to others.

Reports from private individuals are no less valuable, but they describe the everyday effect more than the deeper energetic structure. Both perspectives belong in a hub that documents the pendant in its full breadth.

Consent and Transparency

We publish here only what we can document: every consent is recorded in writing (email, letter or website form with a consent checkbox). The plain-text data of the authors remain internal; on the website only the display name agreed upon at the chosen anonymisation level appears.

Should an author revoke their consent, we remove the contribution immediately (Art. 7 (3) GDPR, right of withdrawal). We respond transparently to feedback on individual reports.

Data-Protection Framework

We publish experience reports exclusively after written consent by the author within the meaning of Art. 7 of the General Data Protection Regulation. The plain-text data of the authors remain internal and are not passed on to third parties.

On the website only the display name agreed with the author at the chosen anonymisation level appears (full name, first name and initial, role designation such as “medium” or “sensitive person”, or fully anonymous). The chosen level is visible in the report itself.

Every consent may be revoked at any time (Art. 7 (3) GDPR). On revocation we remove the contribution within ten working days.

A detailed account of the data-protection framework is given in our Privacy Policy; please direct requests for access to the data stored about you to the email address given in the Legal Notice.

What Experience Reports Are Not

Experience reports on iWell Guard are not scientific efficacy studies, not medical healing promises, and not guarantees of individual experiences. They are subjective perceptions of individual persons who have released their observations for publication with their consent. Other wearers may have different perceptions; this is methodically to be expected and not contradictory.

For legal reasons we also point out: experience reports replace neither medical, psychological nor legal advice. Anyone dealing with health symptoms or acute crises should consult qualified specialists.

The iWell Guard is a protective-field pendant, not a medical device within the meaning of medical-device law. A full legal classification is given on the page Legal Information.

Voices of Mediums

Trained mediums who work with the cosmic information field, and therapists, report here on their perception and practice with the protective pendant. These documented voices are contemporary testimonies of individuals; their reports are subjective and do not constitute scientific verification, but they can be captured within the framework of qualitative research methods.

Voices of Sensitive Individuals

People who are energetically hypersensitive or react in a particularly fine-tuned way to their surroundings report here.

Anonymous, sensitive person · Wearing time: 3 weeks

“Since I have been wearing the pendant, the pressure in my head during long screen times has noticeably decreased. No advertising, simply my experience.”

[further voices of sensitive individuals]

I feel a completely surrounding protective shield, similar to a cocoon. The only connection that comes through is from the crown to the central sun (primal source) and from the root chakra to the centre of the earth (Gaia) as grounding. External energies are fully shielded off. No evil eye or other black magic gets through. I feel an intense energy torus. It reaches up to the 7th astral plane. Spirits and demons only reach the 6th plane.
Holger G. Seehausen Altmark
I felt something being swirled out of the heart chakra. I felt it in my head and at my teeth, like a pull near a pyramid. It rose up in the head, which was cleared, and went down to the feet. I felt a connection downwards and upwards.
Sabine v. L. aus L.
Beforehand “attacks” close to the heart, through the shoulder blade into the chest. Tightness in the chest. After putting on the pendant the attacks stopped. On the first night, restless sleep and trouble falling asleep due to the suddenly higher energy. In the morning, no attacks during the night, more energy, a freer spirit.
Silvia R. aus N.
In the first week, it felt as though everything in the way of attacks that had happened was repeating itself, only without the negative effects. Then it was gone again. The felt piercing-through, the pressure on the heart, but without fear and without direct pain. Afterwards everything was gone and everything feels lighter. The head is freer. Since putting on the pendant, no more black-magical attacks.
Rosemarie I. aus G.
I feel a protective cocoon around me. The heart and forehead reacted first. With me it is no longer all as dramatic as before. I am clearly defined. I no longer have any nightmares. My cat always used to sleep next to my head in bed. Since I have had the pendant she sleeps in her basket. She no longer needs to protect me.
Anja aus F.

Voices of Experts

Submitting an Experience Report

Have you yourself had an encounter with one of the beings described on this portal, a ghostly appearance, an unexplained dream, an event interpreted as synchronicity, a shamanic vision or a mediumistically received image? Since 2024, iwell-guard.com has been systematically collecting such reports in order to document, alongside the religious-historical academic sections, a complementary experiential dimension.

Reports of experiences may be submitted in German with a minimum of 200 and a maximum of 3000 words.

Important elements are: the most precise temporal and local situating possible, a description of your own prior state (waking state, trance, half-sleep, etc.), a differentiated description of perception (seeing, hearing, feeling, smelling) and, as far as possible, a retrospective situating.

Personal data are anonymised on request; verifiable reports (e.g. with independent witnesses or documentary traces) are given preference. Submission via the contact form in the footer.

Voices of Private Individuals

Editorial Review and Categorisation

Submitted reports go through a three-stage editorial procedure. First stage: formal review, completeness of information, minimum length, coherent structure. Second stage: content classification.

To which class of beings (spirit, deity, demon, light being, nature spirit) and to which cultural tradition does the described phenomenon most likely correspond? At this stage it is also examined whether psychological, neurological or social patterns of explanation (hypnopompia, pareidolia, collective conditioning) fit more plausibly than a being-based frame of reference.

Third stage: cross-comparison. Does the report match structurally similar reports from other cultures or historical periods? We follow the principle: phenomenology before ontology.

That is, we document how something was experienced, without necessarily taking a position on what it “really” was. The experience reports appear in anonymised form in their own section and are linked to the respective being detail pages as a cross-reference.

Submitting Your Own Report

If you use the pendant and would like to share your report here, please use our contact form. We wish to remain transparent: you confirm consent to publication explicitly, you decide on the anonymisation level yourself and you can revoke consent at any time.

What we would appreciate:

  • Concrete context (how long, in which situations)
  • Your own perception without a healing promise to others
  • Signature or confirmation of full name by email (we publish only the display name)
  • Indication of your author type (medium, sensitive person, expert, private individual)

Disclaimer

Experience reports are personal, subjective statements by individual users. They are not scientific proof, not healing promises, and not a guarantee of individual experiences. All reports shown here are published with the consent of their authors.

More on the methodology of our work with experience reports: /methodik/#benutzerkommentare

Methodical Classification of the Reports

We organise the experience reports by a simple classification: trained mediums are persons with documented practice and training in mediumistic procedures; their reports are generally methodically reflected and supplied with examination approaches.

Sensitive persons are energetically hypersensitive without formal training; their reports reflect subjective perceptions without methodical claim. Experts are naturopaths, therapists and energy workers who work with the pendant in a professional context. Private individuals, finally, are wearers without mediumistic or professional backgrounds.

What We Do Not Claim

With the experience reports we make no claims of efficacy in the natural-scientific sense. The reports are subjective perceptions of individual persons; they are not representative, not reproducible, not clinically validated.

Whether the perceptions reported rest on a real energetic effect, on a placebo effect, on confirmatory perceptual selection or on a combination of these mechanisms is a subject of religious-historical and psychological research that we do not decide here.

Why We Publish the Reports Nevertheless

The reports have documentary value. They show the diversity of contexts of use, they give other wearers comparative material, they are part of the development of a reflective tradition of practice.

A website on a protective pendant containing only theoretical explanations without reports of use would be incomplete; we wish to give applied experience the space it is due, without interpreting it beyond what it is.

Data Protection and Consent

All published reports contain only information for which we have the express consent of the reporting person. Personal names are given in full only with explicit release; otherwise we use first-name initials or anonymised designations.

Professional backgrounds and regional indications are given only where they are relevant for situating the report and have been released by the person. Reports can be removed at any time on request; there is no obligation to maintain a report once given.

Standard literature (Comparative religious studies):

  • Hanegraaff, Wouter J. (Ed.): Dictionary of Gnosis and Western Esotericism. Brill, Leiden 2005.
  • Smith, Jonathan Z.: Map Is Not Territory. Studies in the History of Religions. Brill, Leiden 1978.

Further standard works in the literature index.

↑